Jung, Winnicott e a psique cindida

Autores

  • Norcirio Queiroz UFPR
  • Mark Saban Universidade de Essex

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21901/2448-3060/self-2024.vol9.213

Palavras-chave:

Winnicott, dissociação, Myers, Flournoy, Janet, Psique multipla

Resumo

Em sua resenha de “Memories Dreams Reflections”, Winnicott diagnosticou Jung como sofrendo de uma cisão psíquica e caracterizou o conteúdo e a estrutura da psicologia analítica como moldados e condicionados principalmente pela busca defensiva de Jung por um “self que ele pudesse chamar de seu”. Esta análise patologizante continua a ser endossada por escritores junguianos contemporâneos. Neste artigo tento mostrar que a crítica de Winnicott é fundamentalmente equivocada, pois deriva de um modelo psicanalítico da psique, um modelo que considera toda dissociação como necessariamente patológica. Argumento que a compreensão de Jung sobre a psique difere radicalmente deste modelo e, além disso, que corresponde, em geral, ao tipo de modelo dissociativo que encontramos nos escritos de Frederic Myers, William James e Theodor Flournoy. Concluo que uma relação fecunda entre Psicanálise e Psicologia Analítica depende da consciência dessas importantes diferenças entre os dois modelos psíquicos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Norcirio Queiroz, UFPR

Norcirio Queiroz - mestre em Psicologia pela UFAM, doutorando em Psicologia pelo PPGPSI na linha de pesquisa Psicologia Clínica pela UFPR

Mark Saban, Universidade de Essex

Mark Saban - PhD pela University of Essex, professor da University of Essex no Departamento de estudos Psicossociais e Psicanalíticos

Referências

Borch-Jacobsen, M., & Shamdasani, S. (2011). The Freud files: an Inquiry into the history of psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979842

Crabtree, A. (2009). Automatism and secondary centers of consciousness. In Irreducible mind: toward a psychology for the 21st century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Ellenberger, H. F. (2008). The discovery of the unconscious: the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.

Flournoy, T. (2015). From India to the planet Mars: a case of multiple personality with imaginary languages. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400872831

Fordham, M. (1961). C.G. Jung 26 July 1875 to 6 June 1961. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 34, 167-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1961.tb00943.x

Haule, J. R. (1983). Archetype and integration: exploring the Janetian roots of analytical psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 28(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1983.00253.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1983.00253.x

Haule, J. R. (1984). From somnambulism to the archetypes: the French roots of Jung’s split with Freud. The Psychoanalytic Review, 71(4), 635-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1986.10402690.

Haule, J. R. (1986). Pierre Janet and dissociation: the first transference theory and its origins in hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 29(2), 86-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1986.10402690

James, W. (1892). What psychical research has accomplished. In William James: writings 1878-1899. New York: Library of America.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000

Jung, C. G. (1970). On the psychology and pathology of so-called occult phenomena (CW, Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1902). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10663-001

Jung, C. G. (1972). Psychological factors determining human behaviour (CW, Vol. 8). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1936).

Jung, C. G. (1970). Good and evil in analytical psychology (CW, Vol. 10). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1959).

Jung, C. G. (1987). C.G. Jung speaking: interviews and encounters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G., & Jaffé, A. (1989). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Vintage Books.

Kalsched, D. (2013). Trauma and the soul: a psycho-spiritual approach to human development and its interruption. London: Routledge.

Keeley, J. P. (2001). Subliminal promptings: psychoanalytic theory and the Society for Psychical Research. American Imago, 58(4) 767-791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2001.0021

Meredith-Owen, W. (2011a). Winnicott on Jung; destruction, creativity and the unrepressed unconscious. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01890.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01890.x

Meredith-Owen, W. (2011b). Jung’s shadow: negation and narcissism of the self. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56(5), 5, 674-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01939.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01939.x

Meredith-Owen, W. (2014). On revisiting the opening chapters of Memories, Dreams, Reflections. In A. Cavalli, L. Hawkins, & M. Stevns (Eds.), Transformations: Jung’s legacy and clinical work today (pp. 22-50). London: Karnac Books.

Meredith-Owen, W. (2015). Winnicott’s invitation to “further games of Jung-analysis”. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 60(1), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12127

Morey, J. R. (2005). Winnicott’s splitting headache: considering the gap between Jungian and object relations concepts. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50(3), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00536.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00536.x

Myers, F. W. H. (1882). Report of the literary committee. Proceedings of the Society of Psychical Research, 1, 116-155.

Myers, F. W. H. (1885). Automatic writing 11. Proceedings of the Society of Psychical Research, 3, 1-63.

Myers, F. W. H. (1888). French experiments in strata of personality. Proceedings of the Society of Psychical Research, 5, 374-97.

Myers, F. W. H. (1891). The subliminal consciousness. Proceedings of the Society of Psychical Research, 7, 298-355.

Myers, F. W. H. (1903a). Human personality and its survival of bodily death (Vol. 1). London: Longmans, Green.

Myers, F. W. H. (1903b). Human personality and its survival of bodily death (Vol. 2). London: Longmans, Green.

Sedgwick, D. (2008). Winnicott’s dream: some reflections on D.W. Winnicott and C.G. Jung. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 53(4), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.00745.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.00745.x

Shamdasani, S. (1993). Automatic writing and the discovery of the unconscious. A Journal of Archetype and Culture, 54, 100-131.

Shamdasani, S. (1994). Introduction: encountering Hélène: Théodore Flournoy and the genesis of subliminal psychology. In From India to the planet Mars: a case of multiple personality with imaginary languages (pp. xi-2). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Shamdasani, S. (1998). [From Geneva to Zürich: Jung and French Switzerland]. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43, 115-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00012

Shamdasani, S. (1999). Memories, dreams, omissions. In P. Bishop (Ed.), Jung in contexts: a reader (pp. 33-50). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360910-2

Shamdasani, S. (2000). Misunderstanding Jung: the afterlife of legends. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 45(3), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00176

Shamdasani, S. (2002). Psychoanalysis Inc. The Semiotic Review of Books, 13, 6-10.

Shamdasani, S. (2003). Jung and the making of modern psychology: the dream of a science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490095

Stephenson, C. (2009). Complex. In D. A. Leeming, K. Madden, & S. Marlan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and religion (pp. 165-168). New York: Springer.

Taylor, E. (1980). William James and C.G. Jung. A Journal of Archetype and Culture, vol. 20, 157-169.

Taylor, E. (1986). C.G. Jung and the Boston psychopathologists In E. Taylor, Carl Jung and soul psychology (pp. 131-144). New York: Haworth Press.

Taylor, E. (1996). The new Jung scholarship. The Psychoanalytic Review, 83(4), 547-568.

Taylor, E. (1998). Jung before Freud, not Freud before Jung: the reception of Jung’s work in American psychoanalytic circles between 1904 and 1909. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00011

Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Psycho-analytic explorations. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Winnicott, D. W. (1990). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. Princeton, NJ: Karnac Books.

Winnicott, D. W. (1992). Review of Jung’s memories, dreams, reflections. In D. W. Winnicott, Carl Gustav Jung: critical assessments. London: Routledge.

Witzig, J. S. (1982). Theodore Flournoy: a friend indeed. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 27(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1982.00131.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1982.00131.x

Wright, P. (1997). History of dissociation in Western psychology. In P. Wright, Broken images broken selves: dissociative narratives in clinical practice. Washington, D.C.: Brunner/Mazel.

Downloads

Publicado

26-08-2024

Como Citar

Queiroz, N., & Saban, M. (2024). Jung, Winnicott e a psique cindida. Self - Revista Do Instituto Junguiano De São Paulo, 9, e006. https://doi.org/10.21901/2448-3060/self-2024.vol9.213

Edição

Seção

Artigo de divulgação científica

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.